<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for shroomAzoom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shroomazoom.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shroomazoom.com</link>
	<description>But I Digress…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:43:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Unfaithful One by Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.shroomazoom.com/2010/03/unfaithful-one/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shroomazoom.com/?p=474#comment-96</guid>
		<description>If it makes you feel any better, I&#039;d gotten out of the habit of reading your blog too. Oops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it makes you feel any better, I&#8217;d gotten out of the habit of reading your blog too. Oops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unfaithful One by shroomAzoom</title>
		<link>http://www.shroomazoom.com/2010/03/unfaithful-one/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>shroomAzoom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shroomazoom.com/?p=474#comment-95</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I guess so, usually, eh? I thought I was in the habit of posting regularly. That was the rut. I guess I got out of that one and into a new rut, where I don&#039;t post regularly. But hopfuly I&#039;m back in the previous rut now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I guess so, usually, eh? I thought I was in the habit of posting regularly. That was the rut. I guess I got out of that one and into a new rut, where I don&#8217;t post regularly. But hopfuly I&#8217;m back in the previous rut now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unfaithful One by Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.shroomazoom.com/2010/03/unfaithful-one/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shroomazoom.com/?p=474#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Wait, do you want to be in the rut, or out of it?  I thought being in a rut was a bad thing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, do you want to be in the rut, or out of it?  I thought being in a rut was a bad thing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Advice On Old Country Buffet by Brian Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.shroomazoom.com/2010/02/advice-on-old-country-buffet/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 06:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shroomazoom.com/?p=127#comment-85</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t eaten at that place in years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t eaten at that place in years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Advice On Old Country Buffet by reliabletoaster</title>
		<link>http://www.shroomazoom.com/2010/02/advice-on-old-country-buffet/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>reliabletoaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 03:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shroomazoom.com/?p=127#comment-83</guid>
		<description>More shroom posts.  C&#039;mon, you had a good thing going there for a bit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More shroom posts.  C&#8217;mon, you had a good thing going there for a bit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Question About Abraham&#8217;s Visitors by Yvonne Gallant</title>
		<link>http://www.shroomazoom.com/2010/01/question-about-abrahams-visitors/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Yvonne Gallant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shroomazoom.com/?p=118#comment-74</guid>
		<description>The best thing to do is to look at other scriptures around the scripture you are trying to understand and to look at other scriptures as well in the Bible if they apply.
John 1:18 says &quot;No man has seen God at any time&quot;
so we can conclude from this that Abraham was not visited by God himself.

Gen 18:22 and Gen 19:1 are the big clues to who these visitors are.  Gen 18:22 says &quot;At this point the men turned from there and got on their way to Sod′om; but as for Jehovah, he was still standing before Abraham.&quot;
Gen 19:1 says &quot;Now the two angels arrived at Sod′om by evening,...&quot;

So the &quot;men&quot; were angels, and 19:1 says TWO of the three went to Sodom, which meant one stayed back to represent God to Abraham.

Hope that helps Shroomazoom, its really commendable that you meditate on things like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best thing to do is to look at other scriptures around the scripture you are trying to understand and to look at other scriptures as well in the Bible if they apply.<br />
John 1:18 says &#8220;No man has seen God at any time&#8221;<br />
so we can conclude from this that Abraham was not visited by God himself.</p>
<p>Gen 18:22 and Gen 19:1 are the big clues to who these visitors are.  Gen 18:22 says &#8220;At this point the men turned from there and got on their way to Sod′om; but as for Jehovah, he was still standing before Abraham.&#8221;<br />
Gen 19:1 says &#8220;Now the two angels arrived at Sod′om by evening,&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>So the &#8220;men&#8221; were angels, and 19:1 says TWO of the three went to Sodom, which meant one stayed back to represent God to Abraham.</p>
<p>Hope that helps Shroomazoom, its really commendable that you meditate on things like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CBC Radio&#8217;s Incredibly Partisan Political Corespondent by Derek Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.shroomazoom.com/2010/01/cbc-radios-incredibly-partisan-political-corespondent/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 01:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shroomazoom.com/?p=104#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Umm... as I recall the budget was balanced by the liberals.  1997 or so?  The huge debt is the fault of a variety of past governments, not the fault of one particular party.  Trudeau rang it up.  So did Mulroney.  It was actually Chretien and Martin who brought an end to deficit spending.  Only to return under Harper....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm&#8230; as I recall the budget was balanced by the liberals.  1997 or so?  The huge debt is the fault of a variety of past governments, not the fault of one particular party.  Trudeau rang it up.  So did Mulroney.  It was actually Chretien and Martin who brought an end to deficit spending.  Only to return under Harper&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avatar is Boring by Derek Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.shroomazoom.com/2010/01/avatar-is-boring/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 01:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shroomazoom.com/?p=113#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Avatar = best movie of all time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avatar = best movie of all time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avatar is Boring by reliabletoaster</title>
		<link>http://www.shroomazoom.com/2010/01/avatar-is-boring/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>reliabletoaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shroomazoom.com/?p=113#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Ah, but then should we have paraphrased versions of the scripture, like the Message?  And really, any English translation is not the way God gave it to us.  It&#039;s been translated, paraphrased, interpreted, etc.  So what&#039;s one more level to that, really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, but then should we have paraphrased versions of the scripture, like the Message?  And really, any English translation is not the way God gave it to us.  It&#8217;s been translated, paraphrased, interpreted, etc.  So what&#8217;s one more level to that, really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Avatar is Boring by shroomAzoom</title>
		<link>http://www.shroomazoom.com/2010/01/avatar-is-boring/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>shroomAzoom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 03:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shroomazoom.com/?p=113#comment-70</guid>
		<description>That first point you&#039;re thiking about is really interesting (graphs vs lists.) My first reaction was, &quot;I&#039;d like to see the charts and graphs.&quot; My second thought is that God gave us Leviticus in the form of the written word, so that&#039;s probably a sufficient way (or perhaps even the best way) to communicate its contents to is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That first point you&#8217;re thiking about is really interesting (graphs vs lists.) My first reaction was, &#8220;I&#8217;d like to see the charts and graphs.&#8221; My second thought is that God gave us Leviticus in the form of the written word, so that&#8217;s probably a sufficient way (or perhaps even the best way) to communicate its contents to is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
