<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CBC Radio&#8217;s Incredibly Partisan Political Corespondent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shroomazoom.com/2010/01/cbc-radios-incredibly-partisan-political-corespondent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shroomazoom.com/2010/01/cbc-radios-incredibly-partisan-political-corespondent/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cbc-radios-incredibly-partisan-political-corespondent</link>
	<description>But I Digress…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:43:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.shroomazoom.com/2010/01/cbc-radios-incredibly-partisan-political-corespondent/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 01:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shroomazoom.com/?p=104#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Umm... as I recall the budget was balanced by the liberals.  1997 or so?  The huge debt is the fault of a variety of past governments, not the fault of one particular party.  Trudeau rang it up.  So did Mulroney.  It was actually Chretien and Martin who brought an end to deficit spending.  Only to return under Harper....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm&#8230; as I recall the budget was balanced by the liberals.  1997 or so?  The huge debt is the fault of a variety of past governments, not the fault of one particular party.  Trudeau rang it up.  So did Mulroney.  It was actually Chretien and Martin who brought an end to deficit spending.  Only to return under Harper&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.shroomazoom.com/2010/01/cbc-radios-incredibly-partisan-political-corespondent/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shroomazoom.com/?p=104#comment-61</guid>
		<description>You would think that if they really didn&#039;t like Harper&#039;s policies then that they would be happy that Parliament has been prorogued since that means the he won&#039;t be able to push any agenda through.  But no, since it isn&#039;t about specific things and instead about partisanship, so then bring on the hate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would think that if they really didn&#8217;t like Harper&#8217;s policies then that they would be happy that Parliament has been prorogued since that means the he won&#8217;t be able to push any agenda through.  But no, since it isn&#8217;t about specific things and instead about partisanship, so then bring on the hate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carla</title>
		<link>http://www.shroomazoom.com/2010/01/cbc-radios-incredibly-partisan-political-corespondent/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Carla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shroomazoom.com/?p=104#comment-60</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m getting awfully frustrated with the coverage of the prorogation.  I respect the fact that people may not like it, but the emphasis on this prorogation is implying that Prime Minister Harper has dug up and dusted off a long-unused piece of parlimentary procedure when in fact Prime Ministers including St. Laurent, Trudeau, Mulroney and Chretien have asked for and received around 100 of them in our parliamentary history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m getting awfully frustrated with the coverage of the prorogation.  I respect the fact that people may not like it, but the emphasis on this prorogation is implying that Prime Minister Harper has dug up and dusted off a long-unused piece of parlimentary procedure when in fact Prime Ministers including St. Laurent, Trudeau, Mulroney and Chretien have asked for and received around 100 of them in our parliamentary history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.shroomazoom.com/2010/01/cbc-radios-incredibly-partisan-political-corespondent/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shroomazoom.com/?p=104#comment-59</guid>
		<description>No real surprise here; there seems to be a rather anti-Harper climate in much of the CBC&#039;s programming. I might not agree with the proroguing coming when or how it does, but it is part of parliamentary democracy to be allowed to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No real surprise here; there seems to be a rather anti-Harper climate in much of the CBC&#8217;s programming. I might not agree with the proroguing coming when or how it does, but it is part of parliamentary democracy to be allowed to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

